Justice can prevail!
Scary times here in Canada. We think of ourselves as a peace-loving people and yet someone starts shooting a firearm at a PQ victory rally; a torso is found in a suitcase in Lake Ontario; another recent dismembering of a body in Montreal.
We're not insulated from violence even though we don't allow our citizens to be armed in public. We even had a gun registry at one time although as we see, that didn't prevent the recent tragedy. But I'm still in favour of it. We try to keep safe but the best we can do is to be non-violent persons ourselves.
It brings to mind a woman at a signing who said to me, she didn't like people who wrote about crime. In probing a bit, I realized she blamed crime writers for inciting people to commit crimes. Hmm. If only it were that simple. Eliminate crime novels and we'd have no more crime. I'd be willing to switch to writing romances if that were guaranteed to do the trick.
I wonder if she'd even read a crime novel. She seemed to have missed the part about justice being served in most of our works. The author definitely writes about a crime
but the focus is on the sleuth, the detective, the good guy who spends the entire novel trying to catch the perp and bring him to justice. I do acknowledge that's not always the case but it fits the majority of our novels.
This is what sets the crime novel apart from the headlines. This provides a reassurance that sanity can prevail even though it's sometimes hard to find it when viewing a TV newscast.
I think that woman should have thanked crime writers. Fiction is seldom more violent or stranger than reality. I, for one, like to have a healthy dose of justice in my life.
Linda Wiken/Erika Chase
A KILLER READ
Berkley Prime Crime, now available
READ & BURIED, coming Dec., 2012;
available now for pre-order
www.erikachase.com
Showing posts with label reality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reality. Show all posts
Friday, September 7, 2012
Thursday, January 13, 2011
LADIES' KILLING THURSDAYS
More than just the facts
Earlier this week, David Cole, a dear friend and author who lives half the year in Tuscon, questioned whether, in the light of the real-life horror of the Tuscon mass murder, he should abandon the book he was writing. Somehow it felt cheap and
exploitive to be writing about murder as entertainment.
I remember having a similar thought after Sept. 11. How could I continue to invent suffering and death, how could I write about the anguish of survivors and families, when so many people were living a tragedy far worse than I could imagine? In fifteen catastrophic minutes, not only did thousands of people lose their lives and the two tallest buildings in New York collapse into dust, but the psyche of the American people was slashed to its core.
Six weeks later, I attended a conference of mystery writers and readers in Washington D.C., just across the river from the still-scarred Pentagon. Normally this conference is a raucous, boozy, fun-filled three days of talking with fellow mystery lovers about such things as the elements of a perfect crime. In November 2001, the mood was sombre, the talk cathartic and personal. People talked about their experiences, reactions and memories. Everyone was struggling to make sense of what had happened and to give voice to their feelings. Some found they couldn’t write at all, that their hearts weren’t in it or their concentration was shot. Some wrote poetry, others wrote almost free-style as emotions bled out. Many of us wondered whether we ever could, or should, write about death again. Not just death, but murder. Do we need to hold a mirror up to the blackest part of our soul, shine a light into the darkest, most primal cave?
Yes, we do.
We need to understand and face the worst that humanity can offer; we need to experience the rage, the fear, the pain and loss and to emerge at the end of it with
some sense of victory. All from the safety of our armchairs. That sounds hokey, but crime fiction is often called the modern day morality play. It’s the mythical battle of good vs. evil and the quest for justice. Murder mysteries are not about murder and mayhem, they are about people struggling with death, facing fear, rage, hatred, loss, and pain. Whether they make us laugh at it, challenge our deductive powers, make us weep with shared sorrow, or scare the living daylights out of us, they all have that in common.
Few authors tackle such horrific tragedies as Sept. 11 or the Holocaust directly. Sometimes the pain is simply too raw, and sometimes the authors sense a fine line between dealing with a topic and exploiting the real suffering of victims and their families. Yet the power of fiction is that it doesn’t really matter. A mystery novel that explores trauma in wartime or disaster can touch people the world over, no matter what their trauma. The sense of shared experience, of being understood, is a powerful comfort. Fiction gets at emotional truth in a way that history texts and even biographies don’t. It is about people, not facts.
For the author as well, fiction can be a great catharsis. I usually write about issues and people that trouble me, and although I disguise the subject and the characters, I can plumb the depths of my frustrations and my concern. That’s the beauty of fiction. It’s a shared emotional experience, and along the way, I hope we all learn a little more about compassion and human need. A very good reason to keep on plotting murders on the page, I think.
Barbara Fradkin is a child psychologist with a fascination for how we turn bad. In addition to her darkly haunting short stories in the Ladies Killing Circle anthologies, she writes the gritty, Ottawa-based Inspector Green novels which have
won back to back Arthur Ellis Awards for Best Novel from Crime Writers of Canada. The eighth in the series, Beautiful Lie the Dead, which explores love in all its complications, is hot off the press.
Earlier this week, David Cole, a dear friend and author who lives half the year in Tuscon, questioned whether, in the light of the real-life horror of the Tuscon mass murder, he should abandon the book he was writing. Somehow it felt cheap and
exploitive to be writing about murder as entertainment. I remember having a similar thought after Sept. 11. How could I continue to invent suffering and death, how could I write about the anguish of survivors and families, when so many people were living a tragedy far worse than I could imagine? In fifteen catastrophic minutes, not only did thousands of people lose their lives and the two tallest buildings in New York collapse into dust, but the psyche of the American people was slashed to its core.
Six weeks later, I attended a conference of mystery writers and readers in Washington D.C., just across the river from the still-scarred Pentagon. Normally this conference is a raucous, boozy, fun-filled three days of talking with fellow mystery lovers about such things as the elements of a perfect crime. In November 2001, the mood was sombre, the talk cathartic and personal. People talked about their experiences, reactions and memories. Everyone was struggling to make sense of what had happened and to give voice to their feelings. Some found they couldn’t write at all, that their hearts weren’t in it or their concentration was shot. Some wrote poetry, others wrote almost free-style as emotions bled out. Many of us wondered whether we ever could, or should, write about death again. Not just death, but murder. Do we need to hold a mirror up to the blackest part of our soul, shine a light into the darkest, most primal cave?
Yes, we do.
We need to understand and face the worst that humanity can offer; we need to experience the rage, the fear, the pain and loss and to emerge at the end of it with
Few authors tackle such horrific tragedies as Sept. 11 or the Holocaust directly. Sometimes the pain is simply too raw, and sometimes the authors sense a fine line between dealing with a topic and exploiting the real suffering of victims and their families. Yet the power of fiction is that it doesn’t really matter. A mystery novel that explores trauma in wartime or disaster can touch people the world over, no matter what their trauma. The sense of shared experience, of being understood, is a powerful comfort. Fiction gets at emotional truth in a way that history texts and even biographies don’t. It is about people, not facts.
For the author as well, fiction can be a great catharsis. I usually write about issues and people that trouble me, and although I disguise the subject and the characters, I can plumb the depths of my frustrations and my concern. That’s the beauty of fiction. It’s a shared emotional experience, and along the way, I hope we all learn a little more about compassion and human need. A very good reason to keep on plotting murders on the page, I think.
Barbara Fradkin is a child psychologist with a fascination for how we turn bad. In addition to her darkly haunting short stories in the Ladies Killing Circle anthologies, she writes the gritty, Ottawa-based Inspector Green novels which havewon back to back Arthur Ellis Awards for Best Novel from Crime Writers of Canada. The eighth in the series, Beautiful Lie the Dead, which explores love in all its complications, is hot off the press.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
TUESDAY BRINGS TROUBLE
When Fiction Collides With Reality
When we devise our mystery novel plots, when we create our characters, when we decide what crime we’re going to write about and who will be victimized and, of
course, who kills, we usually “create” these things from personal experiences, perhaps we’ve “ripped” something from “headlines.” But our product is a novel with the usual disclaimer that characters and events are not based on actual circumstances.
I’m working on my eighth novel, with a plot based on what appears to be a vicious slaughter of several people in what seems to be a home invasion gone terribly wrong. This novel, like all my others, is set in Tucson, Arizona. But today I’m totally at sea, wondering how - or if - I can revise my storyline to reflect the mass shooting three days ago at a Tucson supermarket, with six people dead and another fourteen wounded. No, let’s be honest. I’m really wondering why I’m writing about violence and murder.
No, let’s really be honest. I wonder if I should just abandon this book and try something else.
The shootings took place just three minutes away from my casita in Tucson. When in town, I regularly shop at the Safeway where the shootings happened; I’ve walked all over the actual murder scene at least 100 times. I didn't know any of the victims, but I voted for congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and have always admired her tenacity and love of people. If I'd been in Tucson saturday, I'd have gladly gone just to meet Gabby. An easy drive, just three minutes. I'd have been there. Horrific.
My horror at the killings is so intense I don’t answer phone calls from friends who know I live out there at times and want to get my “feelings” and “opinions.”
Eerily, my storyline has many similarities to Saturday’s tragedy. I just can’t work out whether what I’m doing is creative or exploitive, fiction or fact masquerading as fiction.
What would you do?
David Cole is
overcoming five years of procrastinations and is finally attacking his eighth novel, Ransom My Soul - a somewhat bleak novel of home invasions, drug cartels and human smuggling in southern Arizona, tempered (hopefully) with a fine romance and love story. David's short story, JaneJohnDoe.com, is featured in Indian Country Noir (Akashic Press); he's also working on several non-fiction books about law enforcement, including The Blue Ceiling, a compilation of personal stories about women in law enforcement.
When we devise our mystery novel plots, when we create our characters, when we decide what crime we’re going to write about and who will be victimized and, of
course, who kills, we usually “create” these things from personal experiences, perhaps we’ve “ripped” something from “headlines.” But our product is a novel with the usual disclaimer that characters and events are not based on actual circumstances.I’m working on my eighth novel, with a plot based on what appears to be a vicious slaughter of several people in what seems to be a home invasion gone terribly wrong. This novel, like all my others, is set in Tucson, Arizona. But today I’m totally at sea, wondering how - or if - I can revise my storyline to reflect the mass shooting three days ago at a Tucson supermarket, with six people dead and another fourteen wounded. No, let’s be honest. I’m really wondering why I’m writing about violence and murder.
No, let’s really be honest. I wonder if I should just abandon this book and try something else.
The shootings took place just three minutes away from my casita in Tucson. When in town, I regularly shop at the Safeway where the shootings happened; I’ve walked all over the actual murder scene at least 100 times. I didn't know any of the victims, but I voted for congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and have always admired her tenacity and love of people. If I'd been in Tucson saturday, I'd have gladly gone just to meet Gabby. An easy drive, just three minutes. I'd have been there. Horrific.
My horror at the killings is so intense I don’t answer phone calls from friends who know I live out there at times and want to get my “feelings” and “opinions.”
Eerily, my storyline has many similarities to Saturday’s tragedy. I just can’t work out whether what I’m doing is creative or exploitive, fiction or fact masquerading as fiction.
What would you do?
David Cole is
overcoming five years of procrastinations and is finally attacking his eighth novel, Ransom My Soul - a somewhat bleak novel of home invasions, drug cartels and human smuggling in southern Arizona, tempered (hopefully) with a fine romance and love story. David's short story, JaneJohnDoe.com, is featured in Indian Country Noir (Akashic Press); he's also working on several non-fiction books about law enforcement, including The Blue Ceiling, a compilation of personal stories about women in law enforcement.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
